Why do good papers get few citations?
May 12, 2013 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Publishing
Have you ever looked at Google Scholar or your ISI Web of Science scores and wondered who was citing your papers and why were they citing them? After thinking a bit more about why certain papers on my CV have received as much or as little attention through citation, I decided it was time to … read more
The Importance of Not Being Cited
April 26, 2013 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Writing
This title comes from a 1973 paper in Current Contents by Eugene Garfield called “Uncitedness III—The Importance of Not Being Cited”. In there, Garfield talks about three reasons why papers may not be cited. I. “the uncitedness of the mediocre, the unintelligible, the irrelevant, the eccentric.” II. “the uncitedness of the meritorious but undiscovered or … read more
A note on good research practice: Dooley (2013)
April 8, 2013 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Publishing, Reviewing, Writing
An editorial in the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is entitled “A note on good research practice.” Dooley states: By far the most common issue we editors of this journal are seeing in terms of poor scientific practice in submissions is the failure to appropriately cite the work of others. Sadly, we see numerous … read more
Automation of literature reviews
August 2, 2012 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Writing
A recently published paper in Scientometrics raises the specter of an automated tool that would search through existing citations and “facilitate novices to perform tasks that are usually carried out by trained professionals.” The tool was then used for students to create literature reviews and these were submitted to conferences. The tool was so successful, … read more
The importance of proper citation
May 20, 2012 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Reviewing, Writing
Just recently I discovered a published article that neglected to cite the whole field of the topic that they were investigating. The article did have citations to the statistical methods and other papers that were related to their work, but not a single paper had been cited that had performed the same statistical analyses that … read more
When should you cite a paper?
March 12, 2011 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Resources, Uncategorized, Writing
3 month thesis by James Hayton has a free guide that you can sign up to receive called “The Short Guide to Writing Fast.” Inside I found this concise quote about when you should cite a paper (p. 20): You should only cite a paper… • To support one of your arguments • To provide … read more
Check your reference list!
October 19, 2010 by Prof. David M. Schultz
Filed under Blog, Featured, Writing
A recent paper published in Scientometrics by Robert Lopresti looks at the accuracy of citations in the five leading environmental science journals. Lopresti found that 24.4% of the references in the reference list had errors in them. Almost half of the errors were in the authors names. Almost 30% of the errors were in the … read more
Reference list style guides
As an author, creating and double-checking reference lists in your manuscript are a hassle. Chances are if you make a mistake, a reader will go looking for that source and be stymied by a wrong year or incorrect page number. On top of the problems of accuracy, different journals require different formats for their reference … read more