Sitemap
Posts
- Blog (continued)
- Presentations (continued)
- Publishing
- "Don't use the same word twice."
- A letter from the frustrated author of a journal paper
- A note on good research practice: Dooley (2013)
- A Sharp Rise in Retractions Prompts Calls for Reform
- Accepted at <I>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</I> after nearly two and half years
- Baloney Detection Kit and brainpickings.org
- BEST Journals demonstrate what it takes to be the best.
- Book review: <I>Designing Science Presentations: A Visual Guide to Figures, Papers, Slides, Posters, and More</I>
- Book review: Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English
- Can you list acknowledgements in your CV?
- Communicating low-probability events
- Editorial: How to Be a More Effective Author
- Eliminate excessive and unnecessary acronyms from your scientific writing
- Eloquent Science Workshops for Your Organization
- Even Eloquent Science bloggers get rejected. 😉
- Fictitious paper published in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Free Writing and Publishing Online Workshop: 19–20 June 2024
- Get your paper accepted faster: Responding to reviewers' comments
- Godwin's Law for Emails to Journal Editors
- Help readers find your article online: Search engine optimization
- How to be a more effective reviewer
- How to Prepare a Really Lousy Submission: Water Resources Research Editorial Team
- Is it OK to mentor someone who is writing a peer review?
- ISI Impact Factors versus Scopus SJC Factors
- Most scientific paper retractions due to misconduct
- New American Meteorological Society Author's Resource Center
- Oh...snap! 1895-style.
- Peer review is like a box of chocolates.
- Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism Policy
- Prescient Poem about Writing for Publication
- Publishing companies recognize the benefits of open access when money is involved
- Rejected for publication: What now?
- Responding to Reviewers: It's the way you say it
- Scientific integrity matters! Fabricated peer reviewers lead to 60 retractions.
- Sell no manuscript before its time
- Should peer reviewers be suggested by authors?
- Should quality peer reviewers be recognized by the journal?
- The Boycott of Elsevier
- The decreasing number of studies with negative results
- The impact factor as a useful metric is becoming less useful.
- The Importance of Thinking Before Writing
- The politicization of the scientific publishing process
- Thoughts about Clarke's "Ethics of Science Communication on the Web"
- Thoughts on the impact factors and other metrics: Royal Meteorological Society journals
- To collaborate or not to collaborate?
- Unintended consequences of choosing coauthors
Plugin by dagondesign.com
