In my experience as editor, rarely do I reject a manuscript solely because of improper use of the English language (usually from authors who are non-native English speakers, although not entirely). Many rejected manuscripts have this problem, however, so poorly written manuscripts contribute to the author being unable to convince reviewers that their research is […]
eNews & Updates
Tag Cloudabstract American vs. British book review career careers citing climategate communication concision editorship Eloquent Science ethics figures first person fonts grammar humor improvement jargon journals meteorology music open access outline slide peer review pet peeves poll posters PowerPoint precision presentations public publishing punctuation reference list rejection research resources reviews science spelling statistics teaching title writing
- My response to 3monththesis’s “Why some perfectionism is a good thing”
- Oh…snap! 1895-style.
- Polarimetric radar terminology
- Recent Tweets Love Eloquent Science!
- Dan Keyser’s Edward Lorenz Teaching Excellence Award Speech: Words of Wisdom for Teachers
- A tribute to the teacher without whom Eloquent Science would not have been written
- Want quick publicity? Send out a press release on your unpublished manuscript!
- Lee Grenci is mad as hell about the use of “polar vortex” in the media.
- Sell no manuscript before its time
- More on plain writing in the government
- Past or Present Tense?
- Rejected for publication: What now?
- Thermodynamic diagrams for free
- Are first-person pronouns acceptable in scientific writing?
- Do you end with a ‘thank you’ or ‘questions?’ slide?
- For Those About To Punctuate (Correctly), We Salute You: The Best Links If You Need Help With Punctuation
- How do you get to Carnegie Hall? 10,000 Hours
- How to Research and Write Effective Case Studies in Meteorology
- Bob The Angry Flower: It’s vs Its
- Whether to use colons in titles