In my experience as editor, rarely do I reject a manuscript solely because of improper use of the English language (usually from authors who are non-native English speakers, although not entirely). Many rejected manuscripts have this problem, however, so poorly written manuscripts contribute to the author being unable to convince reviewers that their research is … read more
eNews & Updates
Tag Cloudabstract American vs. British book review career careers citing climategate communication concision editorship Eloquent Science figures first person fonts grammar humor improvement jargon journals meteorology music open access outline slide peer review pet peeves poll posters PowerPoint precision presentations public publishing punctuation reference list rejection research resources reviews science speaking spelling statistics teaching title writing
- More thoughts about scientific poster presentations
- ISI Impact Factors versus Scopus SJC Factors
- Why do good papers get few citations?
- Let there be stoning!
- Market your science on YouTube
- Misrepresenting Science: Saturn’s North Pole “Hurricane”
- Government Guidelines for Concise and Clear Writing
- The Importance of Not Being Cited
- How to determine authorship order quantitatively
- Communicating low-probability events
- Past or Present Tense?
- Rejected for publication: What now?
- Thermodynamic diagrams for free
- Are first-person pronouns acceptable in scientific writing?
- Do you end with a ‘thank you’ or ‘questions?’ slide?
- For Those About To Punctuate (Correctly), We Salute You: The Best Links If You Need Help With Punctuation
- How do you get to Carnegie Hall? 10,000 Hours
- How to Research and Write Effective Case Studies in Meteorology
- Bob The Angry Flower: It’s vs Its
- Whether to use colons in titles