Friday, April 18, 2014

News Feed Comments

The Editor’s Royal Flush

February 8, 2013   Filed under Blog, Featured, Reviewing  

Lately, I’ve been seeing quite a few manuscripts sent out for review that receive one of the following sets of reviews: • reject, accept, major revisions • reject, minor revisions, major revisions I guess these are the equivalent of a royal flush in cards, although I’m not sure the result is as hoped for by […]

Peer review is like a box of chocolates.

January 16, 2013   Filed under Blog, Featured, Publishing, Reviewing  

In talking with Gary Lackmann recently about my philosophy of peer review, the issue came up about how much you can push authors to submit to your will as Editor. I thought about what G. K. Batchelor said in his article in Journal of Fluid Mechanics “Preoccupations of a journal editor” that you don’t have […]

How to Prepare a Really Lousy Submission: Water Resources Research Editorial Team

December 18, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Humor, Publishing, Resources, Reviewing, Writing  

Sent to me from colleagues at the University of Utah. [PDF]

How NOT to review a paper. The tools and techniques of the adversarial reviewer

December 18, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Humor, Resources, Reviewing  

A paper by Graham Cormode (2009) [PDF], sent to me by Rene Garreaud. The abstract gives you a flavor of how this paper reads…. There are several useful guides available for how to review a paper in Computer Science. These are soberly presented, carefully reasoned and sensibly argued. As a result, they are not much […]

Deep thoughts about editing

July 12, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Humor, Reviewing, Writing  

Not sure where I found this, but it’s classic!

The importance of proper citation

May 20, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Reviewing, Writing  

Just recently I discovered a published article that neglected to cite the whole field of the topic that they were investigating. The article did have citations to the statistical methods and other papers that were related to their work, but not a single paper had been cited that had performed the same statistical analyses that […]

Baloney Detection Kit and

May 7, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Publishing, Resources, Reviewing, Writing  

This link from Bogdan Antonescu: The Baloney Detection Kit: A 10-Point Checklist for Science Literacy In fact, has a lot of good posts about books, creativity, life, and writing. Enjoy surfing!

Rejected for publication: What now?

March 19, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Popular, Publishing, Reviewing  

So, your manuscript was rejected? Before you start firebombing the editor’s place of work and writing screeds on your blog, consider the following. Put yourself in the reviewer’s shoes. It may be hard to do so, but it is often the best way to understand what the reviewer is trying to communicate. If the reviewer […]

The Boycott of Elsevier

February 27, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Publishing, Reviewing  

As pointed out by Chris Fairless in the comments on a recent blog post of mine, a movement has started to boycott Elsevier because of their aggressive business practices that hurt libraries and restrict information. The petition is called and started with a blog post here. You can take a stand by signing up […]

Even the University President gets rejected

January 26, 2012   Filed under Blog, Featured, Reviewing  

From the weekly update by University of Manchester President and Vice Chancellor Dame Nancy J. Rothwell, DBE, FRS: I had some bad news on the research publication front, my research group had a great paper rejected by completely unreasonable referees – they were obviously biased – or at least we think so. More work to […]

« Previous PageNext Page »