Sitemap
Posts
- Blog (continued)
- A heretical parenthetical thought
- A letter from the frustrated author of a journal paper
- A note on good research practice: Dooley (2013)
- A proposal for determining session chairs
- A Sharp Rise in Retractions Prompts Calls for Reform
- A subjective discussion of the meanings of "subjective" and "objective"
- A title in need of some help
- A tribute to the teacher without whom <I>Eloquent Science</I> would not have been written
- Accepted at <I>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</I> after nearly two and half years
- Advice on providing better feedback...
- Advice to writers: Treat it like teaching
- American versus British English
- An abstract that says nothing
- An example of an excellent figure
- An example of eloquent science (V. E. Suomi 1979)
- An example of why hyphens are necessary
- An unfortunate order of words
- Announcing: Publiscize
- Another common mistake in least squares fitting
- Appropriate way to label axes of graphs
- Are first-person pronouns acceptable in scientific writing?
- Are students prepared for university-level writing?
- Arial is a cheap imitation of Helvetica
- Automation of literature reviews
- Avoid hyperbole in scientific writing.
- Avoiding pie charts
- Bad Writing and Bad Thinking
- Baloney Detection Kit and brainpickings.org
- Be creative in constructing your figures
- BEST Journals demonstrate what it takes to be the best.
- Best Practices for Numerical Weather Prediction Studies
- Blog Break
- Bob the Angry Flower speaks out against improper apostrophe use
- Bob The Angry Flower: It's vs Its
- Booed for Keeping Speakers on Time
- Book Review: Navigating Graduate School and Beyond
- Book review: <I>Designing Science Presentations: A Visual Guide to Figures, Papers, Slides, Posters, and More</I>
- Book Review: Fake Science 101
- Book Review: Just My Type by Simon Garfield
- Book Review: Science Communication: A Practical Guide for Scientists
- Book review: Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English
- Book Review: Trees, maps, and theorems: Effective communication for rational minds by Jean-luc Duomont
- Can (and should) scientists become great presenters?
- Can I resubmit a rejected manuscript to the same journal?
- Can you answer "yes" to every question for every slide in your presentation?
- Can you explain your science using the 1000 most-used words in the English language?
- Can you list acknowledgements in your CV?
- Case studies: Do I need multiple cases to make my point?
- Chapter 24: Accessible Oral Presentations: Free to download
- Chapter 5: "The Motivation to Write", plus Video: "Overcoming Barriers to Writing"
Plugin by dagondesign.com
